| Welcome to The-Christians-Forum.com. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Gulf Coast Oil Disaster | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 11 2010, 10:47 AM (689 Views) | |
| LoisFaith2000 | Jun 30 2010, 05:56 PM Post #21 |
|
Senior Member
  ![]](http://z3.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)
|
http://rense.com/general91/blood.htm Gulf Oil Catastrophe Planned? Quote: Lawsuits claim that the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig, 52 miles south-east of the Louisiana port of Venice on April 20th, was caused because Halliburton workers improperly capped the well - a process known as cementing. Anything - anything - involving or connected to Halliburton is ultimately controlled and dictated by the Illuminati cabal orchestrated by the House of Rothschild and its associated families. They own Halliburton, lock, stock and millions of barrels. Just eight days before the Gulf blow-out, Halliburton also announced that it had agreed to buy Boots & Coots for $240.4 million. Who are Boots & Coots? The world's largest oil-spill clean-up company which also deals with oil and gas well fires and blowouts. . . Goldman Sachs sold 44 per cent of its holdings in BP, a total of 4,680,822 shares worth the best part of $300 million, in the weeks before the Gulf disaster that sent BP shares plummeting, and Tony Hayward, BP's disgraceful chief executive, is reported to have sold his £1.4 million shares in BP a month before the explosion. The profit allowed him to pay off the mortgage on his mansion. How nice. Some of the consequences: Quote: The scientists said that billions of barrels of oil will be released before the pressure in the enormous cavity five miles below the seabed calms and finds balance and then water would pour into the cavity to replace the oil. They said that the temperature at that depth, some 400 degrees, will turn the water to steam creating a pressure that will lift the ocean floor. They estimate that this will create a tsunami of between 20 to 80 feet, or even higher, that will bring the poisoned ocean ashore to leave great tracts of land uninhabitable and without life. . . Just a look at the map of the Gulf region reveals the potential effect on enormous numbers of people in Mexico, the Caribbean and the southern states of America with so many living on or close to the coastline ... But the scale and potential of what we are seeing goes way beyond even the Gulf. The scientists I mentioned earlier say that the oil has now reached the Gulf Stream, with a current at least four times stronger than in the Gulf of Mexico itself, and this could help to direct the oil all over the world in the next 18 months. It is the Gulf Stream that keeps the United Kingdom and parts of Europe much warmer than they would otherwise be at their latitude, but it will also act as a oceanic conveyor belt delivering the oil from the Gulf Mexico across the Atlantic. . The toxic oil and gas are being added to by the lethal 'dispersant' used by BP to (theoretically, for public consumption only), 'disperse the oil'. They are using Corexit 9500 and Corexit 9527A which are so toxic they have been banned in Europe, although Europe is likely to get them anyway via the Gulf Stream. Corexit is manufactured by a corporation called Nalco, once part of ExxonMobil, and the current leadership includes executives from Exxon and BP. The European Union Times said of Corexit: 'A dire report prepared for President Medvedev by Russia's Ministry of Natural Resources is warning today that the British Petroleum (BP) oil and gas leak in the Gulf of Mexico is about to become the worst environmental catastrophe in all of human history threatening the entire eastern half of the North American continent with "total destruction" ... The sea turning black or red as a sign of the end of the world is found in other cultures, not just in the Bible, in Revelation: Quote: I was talking a couple of days ago to the great Zulu high shaman, Credo Mutwa, and he said that the sea turning to blood during the run up to the 'end of the world' is a theme in his culture, too. He also said that South African sangomas (shamans) are having visions and dreams about the rain falling as blood and 'large lumps of blood rolling in the shore'. The prophecies of the Hopi people in Arizona speak of the sea turning black as a sign that the old age is ending and new one about to begin. It says: 'This is the seventh sign, You will hear of the sea turning black, and many living things dying because of it.' This is the theme of so many 'end of the world' legends and prophecies - a series of events that see the 'old world', cycle, yuga or epoch disappearing to be replaced by a new one. In the Book of Revelation these events are symbolised as 'seals' while the Hopi prophecies call them 'signs'. Zulu legends and prophecies have the same themes and they are remarkably consistent with each other in many ways. |
 |
 
|
| Earendel | Jul 2 2010, 12:26 PM Post #22 |
Administrator
|
I think they are running out of options with how to contain this well. Is this why they are drilling two relief wells? If the one fails, drop a nuke down the other to close it? I think too much can go wrong with this, kind of like shaking a giant soda bottle too much. Will using a nuke cause a methane explosion? |
|
|
| LoisFaith2000 | Jul 3 2010, 11:19 AM Post #23 |
|
Senior Member
|
2b taken with grain of salt and discernment....4 your interest! First hand info re: BP oil leak Dear Friends: One of my clients is a oil spill consultant for BP, home for the 4th of July weekend. I talked to him today. He is supervising the clean up on the Gulf Coast. He is in charge of a big part of the operation. He told me a few things. He said the media is lieing about what is really happening. He says that there is hundreds of boats picking up oil globs from the surface of the ocean and many crews of men picking up oil from the beaches. He says there is no gases leaking and nobody is getting sick. He says there are no evacuations going on and none planned. He says that a hurricane would help by pushing oil onto land making it easier to pick up. Their only concern is that they don’t want oil moving up the Missiissippi River. He say people are visiting the beaches and fishing from the shores. He says that if they can stop the oil from escaping, it will only take about 3 years for the ocean and land to heal itself. He says that he works with the local mayors of the coastal towns keeping them informed. He says that more and more of the clean up work is being contracted out to local people. But, he says that BP has no idea how they are going to stop the leak. The only thing they have planned is something they never done before and they have no idea if it will work. He says BP admitted to him that the accident was their fault. They ignored the recommendations of their own saftey consultants. He says that the ocean floor is stable and there is no signs of anything blowing up. He says that some of the oil flow is restricted but it is flowing very heavy for the most part. He says that there are no flames coming from the well. He told me that the men working on the sight knew that something was wrong because they could smell sulphur gases leaking. They could not do anything about the problem in time to stop it. The real big issue is that nobody knows how to stop the leak. The oil spill consultant told me that the chemicals used to disperse the oil actually creates another environmental threat in addition to the oil itself. He says that more animal and human life will be negatively affected by the chemicals, short term, than the oil will affect animal and human life long term. Don Martin http://lit4ever.org/revivalforum/index.php?PHPSESSID=7fedcbb9962f789dc85a1319614a1062&topic=20391.msg33164;topicseen#new Edited by LoisFaith2000, Jul 3 2010, 11:32 AM.
|
|
|
|
| LoisFaith2000 | Jul 3 2010, 11:37 AM Post #24 |
|
Senior Member
|
Military moving their own families out of Gulf NOW This is a blog I DO NOT know about. DISCERN! I have believed all that gunk cant be spewing forth in the Gulf of Mexico without Earth reacting elsewhere, shifting, shaking, settling. July 01, 2010 Snowplows Ready to Remove Abandoned Vehicles from Highways When Evacuations Occur May 27th there were reports from the USGS that an earthquake was precipitated at 11 miles below the ocean floor when drilling at the Deepwater Horizon site went as deep as 30,000 feet – not the deepest well on earth, but the deepest ever penetrated into such a major source deposit of [this type of] oil, which is why it is coming up red and radioactive. The USGS indicated that this earthquake may have fractured the ocean floor which would explain the oil seeps at 7 to 28 miles away that may not be coming from the drill site at all, but by cracks in the ocean floor caused by this and the giant deposit. Greg Evenson, discussing the problem with separating fact from fiction when determining the situation in the affected regions stated that, “The time for silliness and extraordinary statements that have no basis really need to be called out of the debate because we are losing time, we’re losing ground every moment. It may be [entertainment] to some, but to others it is deadly serious business, and I mean deadly serious.” There have been suggestions that the oil rigs – all operations in the Gulf of Mexico – will be shut down. A video is making it’s way around the internet of Pensacola Florida with methane boiling out of the water, said to be a million times more in some areas, one hundred thousand in some areas, than anything close to normal. Those amounts of methane being released are the equivalent of 20 times more than the carbon dioxide typically being released into the atmosphere from automobiles, etc. Various scientists have postulated that this uncontrolled, massive release of toxins is going to cause extreme phenomenon around the globe, including major fluctuations in climate causing super storms similar to those in the Hollywood movie “The Day After” that are going to be mind boggling. In response to this scenario, Evenson says, “That is absolutely correct, and add to that the absolute disaster that is taking place before our eyes with this overspray, this incredible overspray of Corexit that is causing damage. I’ve seen pictures of it supplied to me… of these crops and trees and other things withering under this continuing assault. As if it’s not enough that B.P. has created all of this problem, now they have created a secondary and a third problem with the debilitation of infrastructure and crops and so-forth from the spraying of this horrible Corexit.” Snow plows are being readied to go up and down the interstate highways in the middle of summer moving stranded vehicles off the road when evacuations begin.” Evenson implored people to not panic, and to simply prepare ahead so that they can move out of harms way before the crush of a full evacuation has begun.” - Greg Evenson thejohnchronicles.wordpress.com/2010/06/29/greg-evenson-new-update-gulf-of-mexico-june-28-2010 There Are report's of excessive methane gas in the gulf.which could be why the water in this video appears to be boiling. |
|
|
|
| LoisFaith2000 | Jul 3 2010, 11:41 AM Post #25 |
|
Senior Member
|
Tourism Industry Suffering on July 4th Weekend July 2 I was told they are seeing oil and tar in Miami, Florida, so I decided to post this. July 3, 2010 As Oil Threatens Miami, Tourism Business Down Along the Gulf Coast There is growing fear that the oil-polluted waters could soon spread beyond the boundaries of the Gulf of Mexico, threatening the tourism industry along the eastern Florida coast. Government forecasters now say there's up to an 80 percent chance that the massive spill will reach the waters off Miami by the middle of August, caught in the loop current around Florida and then pushed northward up the state's east coast at a rate of 100 miles per day. "Just because it's not happening now, it's still prudent to plan that there is a possibility for that to happen," warned NOAA scientist Debbie Payton today. Its been in the loop current for some weeks already - HELLO? If it gets in the loop current, the oil would bypass Florida's west coast, but it would thread through the delicate environment of the Florida Keys before moving toward Miami and Ft. Lauderdale. Most forecasts anticipate that Louisiana will continue to be besieged by the oil, though Texas will be spared. NOAA officials say that Miami would see weathered tarballs, not thick blankets of oil, but that type of material has already been enough to sap places like Dauphin Island, Ala. of beachgoers. No Tourists on Dauphin Island Beaches Along the Gulf Coast, it should have been a fun holiday weekend with free-spending tourists packing the beaches, but instead cleanup crews patrol the sand. Dauphin Island real estate agent Amy Vice said bookings have dropped dramatically. "Last year this time I had 111," Vice said. "We've got ten coming in tomorrow. Vice said that most of her day is spent sifting through cancellations. "I'm afraid that what's going to happen is once it is capped and it's finished and cleaned up, people won't come back," Vice said. "We have a lot of repeat customers and they're trying to keep with us, but they are afraid to bring their families down here." http://abcnews.go.com/WN/bp-oil-s...ng-july-weekend/story?id=11077632 |
|
|
|
| LoisFaith2000 | Jul 4 2010, 12:45 PM Post #26 |
|
Senior Member
|
Treachery In The Gulf June 29, 2010 What has happened in the Gulf of Mexico was not by accident. It was most likely a design to support an agenda. What that agenda is we do not know exactly but I will try to connect the dots. We may soon know the true extent of its nature by the "solutions" our government imposes on the people in the Gulf area. There are some major problems: The Obama administration allowed BP to drill at an unstable site (highly over pressured) in 5,000 feet of water; BP CEO Tony Hayward dumped his BP stock 2 months before the spill; The well was kicking since they drilled into the production zone, so the drilling fluid or mud was underbalanced (mud weight not quite heavy enough for the upward pressure of the gas); Goldman Sachs dumped 44% of BP stock and went short on Transocean stock the day before the spill; The drilling crew knew that the annular blowout preventer was damaged and BP company man Kazula did not order it repaired; BP company man Kazula was a greenhorn on the Deepwater Horizon (he was inexperienced); The well was cased, cemented and had two cement abandonment plugs in place, so how could the well be kicking (trying to blow out)?; BP company man Kazula sent away the Schlumberger team (supposed to do the cement bond log to check Halliburton's cement job on the casing); Despite this the BP company man made the decision to change the mud over to seawater (seawater is 40% lighter than the drilling mud). This is not logical; Shouting match between the rig superintendent and the company man. Superintendent felt that the order to change over to seawater was irrational and suicidal; During the changeover of the mud to seawater is when the blowout naturally occurred; President Obama stood by but did not take action for at least three weeks after the spill; BP and the White House allowed the spill to continue; The White House allowed BP to spray the highly toxic chemical, Corexit 9500, which is considered to be four to ten times more toxic than the oil itself. EPA told BP not to use Corexit 9500 and BP ignored the federal agency. Corexit is being sprayed at nighttime on coastal residences by the CIA-front, Evergreen Air (which reportedly also sprays chemtrails); Negligible cleanup measures on the shores and at sea; Barack Obama sent SWAT teams to production platforms and drilling rigs; Obama sent the Army and National Guard into the Gulf States for what reason? Suppression of investigative reporting of the spill; BP arrested people taking pictures of the area; BP is allowed to reap the benefit of gathering oil rather than stopping the spill; Interests and livelihood of the residents suppressed and not considered in decisions; President Obama is using the spill to get the "Cap and Trade" bill passed; Twenty-two countries have offered their experience in spill control and cleanup but neither our government nor BP has accepted their offers; BP and Obama have declined to use non-toxic microbes as a clean-up measure; BP company man Kazula invoked the Fifth Amendment under congressional questioning of his orders. Where are the environmental groups? The Santa Barbara spill in 1969 was from an offshore drilling rig in the Santa Barbara Channel. It was a blowout on Union Oil's platform A; over ten days it was estimated that 80,000 to 100,000 barrels of crude oil spilled into the channel and onto the beaches from Goleta to Rincon and all four Channel Islands. The oil spill prompted a congressional moratorium in 1981 on new offshore oil leasing with exceptions of the Gulf of Mexico and parts of offshore Alaska that remained in effect until 2008 when Congress did not renew it. This was the coming out of environmental groups. At the same time Friends of the Earth was heavily supported by BP, ARCO, and EXXON in its litigation against those companies to prevent the completion of the Alaska Pipeline until the price of oil was raised by the Ayatollah in 1978. Friends of the Earth then withdrew is lawsuit and the pipeline was allowed to begin transporting much more valuable oil. In 1989 we saw the Exxon Valdez spill which was the largest oil spill at 10.8 million gallons (250,000 barrels) when it hit the Prince William Sound's Bligh Reef. Others estimated a far greater amount, closer to 30 million gallons. It was considered to be one of the most devastating environmental disasters. The tanker's Rayas sonar was not turned on. It was broken and disabled for longer than one year and was considered too expensive to repair or replace. The environmental groups were all over them, and the media piled on. The Exxon Valdez crew was criticized for its slow response. The environmental groups were powerful and their voices were heard. In response to this spill the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) was passed by Congress. It prohibited after 22 MAR 1989 any vessel that has caused a spill of greater than one million US gallons in any marine area from operating in the Prince William Sound. Even though the tanker involved in the spill was double-hulled, this spill resulted in all tankers ordered to be double-hulled. To this day, the spill affects the lives of the people living in the Prince William Sound area. The cleanup has not been successful; more than 26,000 gals of oil remain on the shoreline and the marine life has not recovered. Only 10% of the oil was recovered. Even though the environmental groups may have had some effect on the spill it was the community that took the full brunt of the accident. The Chugach Alaska Corporation had to file Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Losses included recreational sports, fisheries, reduced tourism and of something economists call "existence value," which is the value to the public of a pristine Prince William Sound. The economy of Cordova, Alaska was adversely affected with damage to the herring and salmon stock. Several residents and the mayor committed suicide. Let's take a look at what happened to the cleanup crew of the Exxon Valdez. Workers stood in oil foam for 18 hours per day. The boats steered through a hydrocarbon haze. The workers came from the area fisherman and sportsmen suddenly jobless. They were hired by Exxon. They were treated for headaches, nausea, chemical burns, breathing problems. Many or all of them were never the same after working the summer for Exxon. Most of the workers died young due to lung disease (asthma, emphysema), liver, pancreatic and spleen problems. Workers went in 100% healthy and came out sick. Well and vibrant, they all became sick after a summer of hard work in Prince William Sound. There were thousands of workers affected by headaches, cancer, rashes, kidney and liver disease all the result of massive chemical exposure to the dispersants, solvents and crude oil mix. We may never know how many people were affected by the Exxon Valdez spill because Exxon and their cleanup company, Velco Inc., denied government investigators the medical records. * * * Russia is another country that has had uncontrollable blowouts. They have had five cratered blowouts. They found that drilling a relief well that intersects the wild well and then placing and detonating a nuclear device (which slid the formation across the wild well bore, choking it off) were successful solutions. In 1963 the Russians had a horrible blowout that lasted three years spewing twelve million cubic meters of flaming gas each day. Albert Vasiliev (nuclear physicist and gas well firefighter) said, "We were acting like surgeons in last resort cases, but it worked." The blowout sounded like 100 jet planes all at once. A nuclear blast choked it off. This method was found to be effective and they used it on similar cases. Vyacheslav Klishin (nuclear physicist, gas well firefighter) said, "One needs to tie up the well where the leak is. There are only two ways: 1. [A relief well to intersect the wild well, injecting mud and cement into the bore]; 2. A nuclear explosion." The Russians and other countries are obviously alarmed by the Gulf catastrophe and have offered their experience and expertise in wild well control, but Barack Obama and BP have ignored their offers. We can only infer from this that our government and BP are not going to control the well. There is an agenda, but what is it? What will happen if the well continues to release 125,000 barrels of oil and at least 9,000 PSI hydrogen sulfide, benzene and methylene chloride gases each day? Benzene is the aromatic hydrocarbon component of crude oil, which is highly toxic and carcinogenic to boot. Acceptable levels are 0 to 4 parts per billion. In Florida, Alabama and Louisiana they have measured 3,000 ppb on shore! Hydrogen sulfide is allowable at 5 to 10 parts per billion. In the above states, H2S has been measured at up to 1,200 ppb. The allowable limit of methylene chloride is 61 parts per billion. The same states have found levels as high as 3,000 to 3,400 ppd! The oil flow in the Gulf is equivalent to the Exxon Valdez every two days. It will follow the currents of the Gulf of Mexico to the shores of Louisiana, Mississippi, Florida, Bahamas and the Caribbean. Russian scientists have said that, once in the Gulf Stream, it will drastically affect the fishing industry globally. There are millions of families that have made their livelihoods on fishing, shrimping and crabbing. The restaurant, hotel and sports businesses based on tourism will be affected. The chemicals have evaporated into the atmosphere and have condensed, falling on the plant life, farms and the entire environment surrounding the Gulf of Mexico causing corrosive lesions on plants and killing the birds. It is now raining chemicals in Louisiana. There may be more that it has affected so far but this is what we have seen on the Internet and YouTube. The currents move around the peninsula of Florida and along the East Coast. This will directly affect more coastal regions in a similar fashion as what we are seeing in the Gulf. We are nearing the hurricane season which will drive the toxic mixture inland. The toxic combination of oil, methane and Corexit will continue to have detrimental effects on our environment and humanity. It is a carcinogen. The hydrocarbon fumes and Corexit are causing symptoms which will manifest in diseases that will afflict plants, animals and humans. People along the coastal regions will become sick and die prematurely. * * * It is ironic that the moral and ethical guidelines for the United Nations' Wildlands Project are based on the philosophy of "Deep Ecology." Our government and BP are creating a famine by letting the blowout continue in its present state. As mentioned above, the EPA objected to the use of Corexit 9500 but Barack Obama did not step in to stop its use. Greenpeace has a boat in the Gulf of Mexico performing research. Research is not the first step that is needed in this life-changing disaster. This is the only NGO environmental group that I have seen in the mainstream media. They have not spoken out on the marine life that is being killed daily, nor have they made any statements on the use of the cancerous chemical Corexit. There is a report from the Sea Turtle Restoration Project that BP has stopped the rescue of Kemp's Ridleys that were trapped in the oil. These sea turtles are being burned with the oil. Burning the oil releases toxic fumes into the atmosphere. We seem to be witnessing the collapse of the environmental organizations, none of which has an expected strident position regarding the worst ecological disaster that the modern world has ever known. Hasn't it been their self-appointed responsibility to speak out? Are the environmental organizations taking money from the big polluters? Every step during this disaster appears to be controlled by an unprecedented amount of greed. Even greed does not figure because so much natural wealth is being destroyed. What is really going on here? Barack Obama spoke to the nation for the first time last week with confident assurances that the Gulf coast would be restored to its original condition eventually. There was no method mentioned. He has made four photo ops trips to the Gulf region, conferring mainly with BP and local leaders. He did not speak to the people who reside in the area. The last one I saw was a silent video showing Obama with a BP cleanup crew relaxing at a picnic table. A local resident commented, "The cleanup crew was there for appearances only; their garbage bags were empty. When Obama left, they got on a bus and left, too." Why do we have a media blackout on a catastrophe that will affect the whole world? BP has hired the CIA-front company, Wackenhut, to patrol the shoreline and prevent reporters, residents and visitors from witnessing, describing and recording the damage. Private thugs are forcing the public off public beaches. In 1966, The Report from Iron Mountain asked the question: How do you duplicate the total control over the population in peacetime that you have during wartime? Written by Leonard Lewin and immediately branded a satire by government spokesmen, it nevertheless had the ring of truth. We have since seen all of its extreme programs brought to life by the US government. The most notable example is the 1992 Agenda for the 21st Century. Agenda 21 is a United Nations program but it was spearheaded and directly sponsored by President George H.W. Bush at the Rio Conference. President Bush promised the attendees that Americans would one day pledge their allegiance to the United Nations as he made Agenda 21 de facto US policy. Once in office, one of the first things President Clinton did by executive order was establish the Presidents Council for Sustainable Development. All aspects of life were covered, though no one in Congress complained or demanded hearings or any sort of debate. Seventeen years later we see Agenda 21 being quietly enforced in federal, state and local laws and regulations. Agenda 21 is the framework for world government, imposed on us by our own town and city councils, our own county supervisors. But it's not called "Agenda 21" by the planners. It's called "Sustainable Development." "Sustainable Development" is a code word for world government. The term "world government" is a euphemism for merciless dictatorship. The excuses are the issues of environmental protection, preservation of water and anti-pollution. For example, most of America will be designated as "wildlands" and will be off-limits to Americans. After a severe reduction of the population, survivors will be highly concentrated into "Smart Growth" cities, stacked and packed into high-rise housing projects. By reducing the population to the numbers found around the Dark Ages (five hundred million), government control is thought by the planners to be manageable. To get down to five hundred million people from our present population of six billion people will require a ninety-two percent reduction. The reliable methods of population reduction we saw in the last century Capitalist world wars and Communism only achieved reductions in the hundreds of millions. Famine and genocide in Africa were not sufficiently destructive. Agenda 21 calls for the slaughter of five and a half billion people. AIDS has affected its target populations here and in Africa but the Bird Flu, Swine Flu, Ebola, Lyme disease, BSE (mad cow disease) have not taken the numbers wanted. These are all, in my opinion, government-created weapons. Government vaccine programs have not been successful in creating disease and mortality in the numbers needed. The right combination, however, of disease and famine could accomplish the goal. The oil flow, blown inland by storms, will create water shortages by poisoning fresh water sources. People who have been subsistence-living will no longer have ways to live as they had been doing for generations. Farmers will lose production due to chemical rain, thus creating food shortages and famine across America and possibly Mexico and South America. People living on seafood will have the most difficulty and may die off quickly. Oil residue has already been seen in seafood in restaurants and grocery stores. More economic alternative food sources will be sought as the price of seafood skyrockets. Genetically-altered food sources created by Monsanto will cause disease and early death. Already the use of Monsanto "suicide seeds" in America has adversely affected the honey bees. Our honey bee population has been drastically reduced. Scientists have found that the genetically-altered DNA has affected bee nervous systems, causing a die off, which is now called "colony collapse disorder." Without honey bees, pollination ceases and this will be the end of a natural way of life. There will be migrations to urban areas as the coastal people lose everything that made their lives worth living. The "Smart Growth" collectivization of stacking and packing will begin. A single family home with a yard will be something of the past and longed for. Actually the packing of people into small areas will increase the spread of diseases and violence. Two of the tenets of Deep Ecology philosophy in the Wildlands Project are: The human population must be reduced; western civilization must radically change its present economic, technological and ideological structures. Independent entrepreneurs will be things of the past. To support the Wildlands Project we find the American Lands Alliance group and, at the state level, the creation of the Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana (CRCL), which has turned into a land-grab with the support of the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Coastal Restoration and Protection Authority (CRPA). Here is how it works (from "The Louisiana Land-Grab" by Zack Walley): "The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers has moved to usurp traditional private property protections in Louisiana's Atchafalaya Basin. In a highly questionable action the USACE has forced conservation easements on the properties of an untold number of homeowners, farmers, timber producers and sportsmen in a 338,000 acre area (equaling an area 10 miles wide and 53 miles long). In an attempt to avoid the Fifth Amendment's prohibition against land takings, the USACE attorney did not refer to these as conservation easements but called them 'Flowage Development Control and Environmental Protection Easements' (FLOWAGE) and used some really 'new math' to adjust the 'fair-market value' of the property down from $1,000 per acre to $125." Every day that BP and our government allow the oil to flow and the use of Corexit, more of the earth will be poisoned. The land won't be worth a dollar and a quarter, never mind a hundred and a quarter. The marine life that does survive will be contaminated. Recovery of the areas affected is highly unlikely especially when looking at our past record in the Exxon Valdez spill. The use of cancer-causing Corexit has made this disaster many times more toxic than just oil alone. News reporter Kerry Kennedy says the people in the Gulf are experiencing symptoms of nausea, headaches and burning eyes. Didn't BP learn anything from Exxon, or did they learn too much? No one is encouraged to wear respirators and rubber gloves because BP is worried about causing a state of hysteria, i.e., a state of awareness. The doctors do not know exactly how to treat the patients coming in since they don't know what chemicals BP is using. Only band aids and aspirin are provided to the workers in the Gulf by BP's company doctors. All I can say is that a majority of the Valdez workers were dead ten years later. The White House has not responded appropriately so BP as a corporation has taken control of the area without the consent of the people. Looking at the big picture does put a new light on who is expendable. White House chief of staff Rahm Emmanuel has said, "Never let a crisis go to waste." And Obama says we are addicted to oil. (This from a man whose largest campaign contributor was BP) We would not have to be using so much oil if so many inventors of alternative energy and free energy had not been frightened off or killed. Obama's first televised address to the nation was right out of the UN's Sustainable Development handbook, the comprehensive plan to regulate our behavior via the federal, state and local levels of government, primarily the local level. This scheme has been enhanced until recently by the term "global warming," which was necessarily modified to "global climate change," since we now appear to be in a cooling period. Fortunately, the last climate change conference in Copenhagen failed to produce a new climate change treaty. At Copenhagen, some of the American conservation groups demanded a course of action that will lead to environmental disaster faster. BP is heavily tied to eco-groups like Conservation International and Nature Conservancy. Real science often is thrown out the window to accommodate the programs of Big Oil and Big Coal. This will only be tackled when the green lobbyists in the US stop taking cash from Big Oil and Big Coal. City Paper pointed out that BP spent "hundreds of millions of dollars" to "transform its image from that of a dirty old oil company into 'Beyond Petroleum' a company so environmentally friendly it had transcended oil drilling (and spilling) for happy, sunny and clean technologies such as wind and solar." They also noted that the environmental groups "trumpeted their ties to corporations, arguing that these partnerships lead to better corporate environmental policies and less damage to the planet." That's exactly how the relationship between BP and Conservation International was framed by ABC's "Nightline" back in 2002". The main objectives are to end national sovereignty, abolition of private property, the "restructuring" of the family unit, increasing restrictions on mobility and individual opportunity. Barack Obama's way to do this is with something he calls "Cap and Trade." I must admit, for the longest time I did not know what "Cap and Trade" meant. Nothing in those three words suggests anything to do with ecology but "Cap and Trade" is an environmentally-based scam, an artificial marketplace designed to reduce pollution by paying people who reduce pollution with money from polluters. "Cap" refers to limits, or caps, on emissions. So, we would have an emissions trading system in which total emissions are limited, or capped. Permits would be allocated or auctioned up to the set cap on emissions and a market would allow polluting members who are emitting less than their quotas to sell their excess permits to polluters who need to buy "credits" to meet their caps. Which is all as totally phony as it sounds, and as totally phony as "man-made global warming." The globe is warmed by the sun, or not, if it puts out less heat. Paying money or being paid has nothing to do with pollution or "greenhouse gasses." What "Cap and Trade" does is to create more restrictions and controls on people. Some are asking, is there a hidden agenda behind all the foot dragging to the clean-up and to stopping the spill? At my local library, which covers Santa Barbara County, I asked the reference librarian to help me find anything on the Agenda for the 21st Century. What I found was surprising. There were no books, magazines or videos on this subject. The librarian found two brief articles and one review article not on the subject of Agenda 21 but on one aspect of it, the Wildlands Project. The buzz words "Sustainable Development" were used. Nowhere in the public library could one try to inform himself on the scope of Agenda 21. I suspect that this is the way it is throughout America. Agenda 21 is literally a hidden agenda. The policymakers have created innocent-sounding catch phrases to capture the hearts and minds of our educators and their students. It will be the students who are the spring board to making Agenda 21 possible through grassroots groups that will carry over to our city councils, town councils and county boards where the policies are made. All these "Sustainable Development" policies and regulations have stolen our soul for life for the communal good. These policies are destroying the soul of life. This is what we are giving up every time we accept these policies. The first point in the moral and ethical guidelines for the Wildlands Project is: All life (human and non-human) has equal value (a minnow is as valuable as man). What we are giving away is what sets man apart from all other animals, our souls. This is the most devastating disaster that we have known. It will affect millions of people in the Gulf States, the Eastern Coast and everywhere the Gulf Stream goes. Agenda 21 is not only for America it is international as a United Nations policy for the New World Order. But while we still have some tattered shreds of our Bill of Rights left, each of us who has an ounce of soul left needs to find out for himself and herself the full extent of Agenda 21 and how it will impact on your family's life. Agenda 21 has been creeping through each town and city council for 17 years. The first thing to do is to take a good look at what is happening to the people who are living in the Gulf States and etch into our brains what will happen to your family in the near future. Our response to this must be to seize control of our local institutions, our town and city councils and county boards of supervisors and force the rejection of any and all programs, regulations and policies that conform to the United Nations' Agenda for the 21st Century. Gulf Coast residents must demand non-toxic forms of clean-up such as bioremediation, i.e., oil-eating microbes. Robbi Skye Campbell, humanitarian environmentalist, medical doctor, medicine woman & artist askdrfeather@yahoo.com http://rense.com/general91/treach.htm |
|
|
|
| LoisFaith2000 | Jul 5 2010, 08:28 AM Post #27 |
|
Senior Member
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPtaMgqOwL4 Exclusive oil spill in the Gulf |
|
|
|
| LoisFaith2000 | Jul 19 2010, 11:50 AM Post #28 |
|
Senior Member
|
SEA BED IS STILL LEAKING - SOMEWHERE CJ NOTES July 19, 2010 DO NOT SWIM in the GULF of MEXICO!! Do not let your kids walk on or play in the sands of beaches there! I never did believe BP had fixed the problem they caused intentionally. Its just LIES the intentionally blind sheepl eat to their hurt. Here are a couple links. I am so sick of reporting this since you wont find truth on TV and its difficult to find on the net without hype. I see blogs and videos speak of panic in Gulf states, hospitals full, credit cards cancelled, fuel shortage, troops everywhere, partial lockdowns. I CAN NOT VERIFY ANY OF THEM. No one is credible. Anyone reading this who actually lives there? Those I speak to who live there are not concerned, no plans to leave Here are responses I have gotten. Louisiana I have not seen any panic. I live in Lafayette, Louisiana. We are very concerned about the situation and are preparing to leave but most people think we are crazy. Everything here is very normal. I know people who live very near the Gulf and they are not the least bit worried. A very close relative was working as a security guard in Grand Isle and seems to think we are crazy. A close friend says that she lives 10 miles from the Gulf and she is totally unaware of any danger. She could easily relocate because she owns a house that would be out of harms way. My own daughter lives about 15 miles from the Gulf and is totally unconcerned. My step son lives in Tampa, he is somewhat concerned. TEXAS I have a friend in Houston TEXAS who doesnt seem to be worried at all. Her husband is also a strong Christian. Missouri My mom has chronic bronchial asthma and ever since May she has been having problems with congestion and having to cough a lot to clear her lungs. We are in Missouri but are curious if anyone else away from the gulf has had such problems. Could stuff from the spill be causing this? We have had some winds from the south or SW and had some good rain lately. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- July 18 - testing has revealed that there is a "detected seep a distance from the well" and has ordered BP to quickly notify the government if other leaks are found. "When seeps are detected, you are directed to marshal resources, quickly investigate, and report findings to the government in no more than four hours," retired Adm. Thad Allen said in a letter to BP Chief Managing Director Bob Dudley. "I direct you to provide me a written procedure for opening the choke valve as quickly as possible without damaging the well should hydrocarbon seepage near the well head be confirmed." BP spokesman Mark Salt said Sunday night that he had no information about the leak mentioned in Allen's letter. The letter does not provide further details about where the leak was spotted or how big it is. It was unclear from Allen's letter, released Sunday evening, whether testing on the well had been extended. It was scheduled to last at least until 4 p.m. Sunday. Earlier in the day Allen said officials could decide to extend it in 24-hour increments. July 19 - Testing continues and scientists are evaluating the results to decide whether to resume collecting oil from BP's ruptured deepwater well, the company said Monday. BP's statement came hours after Thad Allen, the federal government's oil spill response director, said that testing had revealed a "detected seep a distance from the well." He ordered the company to quickly notify the government if other leaks were found. "When seeps are detected, you are directed to marshal resources, quickly investigate, and report findings to the government in no more than four hours," Allen said in a letter to BP Chief Managing Director Bob Dudley released late Sunday. BP's statement Monday did not mention the leak, but said the company was carrying out extensive monitoring activities around the well site. Allen's did not provide further details about where the leak was spotted or how big it is. Allen said earlier Sunday that testing would determine whether keeping the well capped was the right solution. Pressure testing results in the well have been lower than expected, he said, which means oil could be leaking out from below. "While we are pleased that no oil is currently being released into the Gulf of Mexico and want to take all appropriate action to keep it that way, it is important that all decisions are driven by the science," he said. "Ultimately, we must ensure no irreversible damage is done which could cause uncontrolled leakage from numerous points on the sea floor." BP said pressure inside the well "continues to rise slowly" in its statement released Monday. In his letter Sunday, Allen gave BP 24 hours to provide the containment plan and schedule that the company would put in place if testing was suspended. http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/07/19/gulf.oil.disaster/index.html?hpt=T1 http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/07....html?hpt=T1&fbid=96MTUnrFxK_ Engineers Detect Seepage Near BP's Capped Oil Well Engineers monitoring BP's damaged well in the Gulf of Mexico detected seepage on the ocean floor that could mean problems http://www.cnbc.com/id/38302949 Alabama water sample explodes July 17 - Despite warnings along the Alabama Gulf Coast, some swimmers are taking their chances. News5 collected samples of water and sand from Orange Beach, Gulf Shores, Katrina Key and Dauphin Island. The samples were tested unsafe at a local lab, and one from Dauphin Island Marina blew up. http://www.wkrg.com/gulf_oil_spil...-water/906545/Jul-18-2010_7-40-pm DO NOT SWIM in the GULF of MEXICO!! |
|
|
|
| LoisFaith2000 | Jul 21 2010, 11:47 AM Post #29 |
|
Senior Member
|
http://www.henrymakow.com/ken_price.html BP Well Cap is a Hoax, its STILL GUSHING!! July 21, 2010 LEAVE the gulf region! The toxic crude-corexit-methane mix is lethal to humans and all animal life The gusher in the Gulf HAS NOT been capped, its a LIE The Horizon well is still gushing full speed. BP's much publicized capping and effort to drill relief wells is nothing but a cynical publicity stunt. Oil industry insider Matt Simmons, former energy adviser to President Bush, calls the capping of the riser 'the biggest con job we've ever seen.' The television photos are of a cap of a reserve well that is miles away from the main well. The original Deepwater Horizon hole is continuing to gush oil into the Gulf from an open hole 10 miles away. I have no means to eyeball this - but FOX and other media DO. I have avoided reporting this disaster was capped, because I DID NOT BELIEVE IT. My Summary of Ken Price, mechanical engineer, and Matt Simmons from this link |
|
|
|
| Earendel | Jul 22 2010, 11:25 AM Post #30 |
|
Administrator
|
Tropical weather could hamper effort to seal oil well By the CNN Wire Staff July 22, 2010 12:43 p.m. EDT  CNN's Rob Marciano takes you inside the biggest cleanup job in the world. Watch "Rescue: Saving the Gulf" at 8 p.m. ET Saturday and Sunday on CNN. New Orleans, Louisiana (CNN) -- Tropical Depression 3 formed near the Bahamas Thursday morning, the National Hurricane Center said, carrying sustained winds of 35 mph and possibly threatening operations to clean up the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The system showed significant signs of intensification during the overnight hours with thunderstorm activity increasing, CNN meteorologist Sean Morris said. Several forecast models show the system could move into the Gulf. The National Hurricane Center issued tropical storm warnings and watches for portions of the Bahamas and Florida. If the system is powerful enough to become a tropical storm, with sustained winds of at least 39 mph, it would be named Bonnie. Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/07/22/gulf.oil.disaster/index.html?hpt=T1 |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Current Events · Next Topic » |
8:36 PM Feb 22